To many Kiwi's kauri hold a sacred place in our hearts, straight and true, noble and precious - those few that remain being revered as totems, reminders of the devastation caused by our hard working forebears. It is my personal view that where possible and practical, and without trampling on the rights of others, Kauri should be protected. Back in March the intentions of landowners to legally fell a kauri on their property in order to build a house drew outrage from all directions. "Green' housewives from their Grey Lynn villas, built from heart kauri with polished totara floors, and greenies from Titirangi (living in homes carved from the bush) sought to exert their will and good intentions to "save" this kauri, ignoring their own rank hypocrisy. A mad activist (whose story was later proven in Court to be a series of lies) climbed the tree and remained in place until a deal was struck between neighbours and the much maligned owners. Whilst unreported, these well meaning neighbours and other "conservationists" undertook to purchase the property from the owners, and could thereby offer everlasting protection. Yesterday a crew turned out to again start work felling the tree, again raising the ire of neighbours and lovies. The owners stand accused of reneging on the arrangement, a mischievous and deceitful misrepresentation of the facts - it is the would be purchasers who have failed in their efforts to "stump up" with the promised cash. Perhaps selling "pot shots" at the latest tree climber could be a money raiser - I'd contribute handsomely for the opportunity. Personally I would love to see the tree remain, but obviously the owners are acting within their rights - unless they are compensated, it is theirs to do with as they see fit. The lovies and protesters should put away their signs and get their wallets out (and I'd be pleased to contribute) - problem solved Comments are closed.
|
Don MalcolmA perfect day involves being on my Harley with a long ride ahead.
|